Practice as InquiryNature of "Knowledge" Lore. Practitioner's lore is driven, first, by a pragmatic logic: It is concerned with what has worked, is working, or might work in teaching, doing, or learning writing. Second, its structure is essentially experiential. That is, the traditions, practices, and beliefs of which it is constituted are best understood as being organized within an experience-based framework. Lore's pragmatic logic and experience-based structure means Metaphor of the "House of Lore" (27) The communal lore offers options, resources, and perhaps directional pressure; but the individual, finally, decides what to do and whether (or how) it has worked—decides, in short, what counts as knowledge. The heart of the Practitioner community derives from its shared institutional experience. Lore as a body of knowledge is embodied in three primary forms: ritual, writing, and talk. Inquiry—Practice as Inquiry Practice becomes inquiry only when 1) a situation cannot be framed in familiar terms, 2) when standard approaches to a familiar situation are no longer satisfactory, or 3) when situation and approach are non-standard—so new approaches must be created. Less than 10% of practice qualifies as inquiry. Form of Practice as Inquiry:
Whereas Experimentalist insist on replicability, Practitioners are satisfied with experience-based testimony. As an art, Practitioner inquiry is most often a combination of informed intuition and trial and error. They gauge the effectiveness of trial solutions by a combination of textual and non-textual indicators. Example Practitioners
|
Modes of Inquiry Home |