Writing Evaluation
The following general criteria form the basis upon which your writing will be evaluated in this class. Each writing task has its specific requirements.
Writing Evaluation Criteria
1. EVIDENCE OF COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING OF THE WRITING TASK AND TOPIC--As
well as meeting the requirements of the writing task, the writer is rhetorically
proficient with managing the writing triangle of writer, audience, and
purpose.
2. CAREFUL CONSTRUCTION
AND ORGANIZATION
a. the writer makes a point and is unified
b. the writer "divides up the proof," structuring the paragraphs
around main parts or points of development.
c. The opening and closing (paragraphs) are effective
3. DEVELOPMENT--The writer develops his or her ideas fully and adequately
with appropriate examples, facts, descriptions, or quotes. In particular,
general and abstract information is followed by sufficient specific examples,
illustrations and description. The goal is to SHOW and not just TELL.
4. COHERENCE--the writer makes efforts to guide the reader through his
or her idea, providing clear signpost transitions
5. A MATURE FLUENCY
a. The writing has a smooth construction and organization which does not
offer any confusion to the reader.
b. Sentences offer a level of variety, conciseness, and attention to word
choice that enhance the readability and engagement of the text.
5. VOICE--The writing reflects the writer's own unique vantage point, language
use, and style.
6. CORRECTNESS IN THE STANDARD CONVENTIONS OF WRITTEN ENGLISH--This includes
spelling, grammar, punctuation, and documentation.
7. HAS THE PIECE OF WRITING ACHIEVED THE DESIRED EFFECT UPON THE INTENDED
AUDIENCE?--each of the elements of writing listed above contribute to achieving
this overall affect.
Our Evaluation
Rubric
Although your drafts are not
getting graded in this class (until the portfolio), you
will be given some quantitative feedback on your writing following this
six-point scale. The upper-lower half distinction represents fairly closely
the division between passing and failing (so if you continually get lower-half
scores you know you are not passing). Remember, that we are working to
present selections of your work in an end-of-course portfolio, and any
piece of writing can be re-written numerous times before it goes into
that portfolio. I encourage you to take the initiative to rewrite pieces
you are drawn to rewrite.
Using the evaluation
rubric to determine scores:
To use the evaluation rubric, the evaluator goes through a sequence of
two major "decisions" to decide what "score" the writing
will receive.
Step One: First,
the decision is made about whether the essay is closer to an upper-half
or a lower-half score. (Roughly passing or not passing.)
Step Two: Once the "half" is decided, then the question is
asked, "Is this a strong or weak upper (or lower) half score?" The short descriptions of the separate essay scores also help in determining
if the essay is a 2 or a 3.
6 Point Scale---- the
six point scale will give you a general idea of where you are with your
writing.
6 = A/B
5 = B/C
4 = C
3 = D
2 = F
Upper Half Characteristics
1. CAREFUL CONSTRUCTION AND ORGANIZATION
- the writer makes a point and is unified
- the writer "divides up the proof," structuring
the paragraphs around main parts or points of development.
- The opening and closing (paragraphs) are effective
2. EVIDENCE OF COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING OFTHE WRITING TASK AND
TOPIC-As well as meeting the requirements of the writing task, the
writer is rhetorically proficient with managing the writing triangle
of writer-subject-reader.
3. DEVELOPMENT-The writer develops his or her ideas fully and
adequately with appropriate examples, facts, descriptions, or quotes
4. COHERENCE-the writer makes efforts to guide the
reader through his or her idea
5. A MATURE FLUENCY
- The writing has a smooth construction and organization
which does not offer any confusion to the reader.
- Sentences offer a level of variety and
attention to word choice that enhance the readability and
engagement of the text.
6. VOICE-The writing reflects the writer's own unique vantage
point, language use, and style.
7. CORRECTNESS IN THE STANDARD CONVENTIONS OF WRITTEN ENGLISH
This includes spelling, grammar,
punctuation, and documentation. |
The 6 paper
This paper, while not perfect, shows
many if not all of the upper half characteristics. The paper shows
originality and clarity of thought. It develops its ideas with logic,
creativity, and awareness of the reader. It is interesting to read
and stands out.
The 5 paper
This paper contains many of the
characteristics of upper half writing, but is lacking somewhere.
The paper clearly states its point and purpose and may have adequate
development; it also has clear ideas. It may lack, however, in originality,
depth of thought and development, mature fluency, or grammatical
correctness.
The 4 paper
This paper meets the basic standards.
It has a central idea and fairly clear organization. This writing
shows a fair understanding of the writing task and the ideas being
written about, makes a point (if weakly), and reveals some awareness
of the reader. Often a 4 paper lacks development and vigor. It lacks
the evidence of thought and/or clarity of thought and maturity that
would place it higher. It contains grammatical errors but not to
the severe level of distracting the reader. |
Lower Half Characteristics
1. LESS CAREFUL CONSTRUCTION AND ORGANIZATION
a. the writer may not make a clear point and/or not
stick to that point
b. the writer does not structure the development of
their ideas in a logical way, especially not "dividing up the proof" and structuring the paragraphs around main parts or points of development.
c. The opening and closing (paragraphs) are ineffective
2. EVIDENCE OF COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING OF THE WRITING TASK AND
TOPIC
a) Requirements of the
writing task may not be understood or met; in addition, the writer
may show little or no rhetorical proficient with managing the writing
triangle of writer-subject-reader.
3. DEVELOPMENT-The writer develops his or her ideas inadequately,
often missing appropriate examples, facts, descriptions, or quotes
4. COHERENCE-the writer makes little or no effort to
guide the reader through his or her idea
5. A MATURE FLUENCY
- The writing has a rough or unclear construction
and organization which cause confusion for the reader.
- Sentences reveal a lack of variety and
attention to word choice that detract from the readability
and engagement of the text.
6. VOICE
The writing does not reflects the writer's own
unique vantage point, language use, and style.
7. PROBLEMS WITH CORRECTNESS IN THE STANDARD CONVENTIONS OF WRITTEN
ENGLISH
This includes spelling, grammar,
punctuation, and documentation. |
The 3 paper
The 3 paper is very much like the
4 paper (it contains upper half characteristics) except that it
may have a more severe problem in a certain area, such as more severe
grammatical problems, problems with unity, or more problems with
organization or development. Often a three paper is described by
this phrase: "if they had only done _____ then it would be an upper
half essay." Many times 3 papers reveal a misunderstanding of the
topic or little effort.
The 2 paper
This writing contains most if not
all the characteristics of a lower-half piece of writing. The writing
has not effectively communicated its ideas. The 2 paper may not
have presented a clear main idea or support it. Often 2 papers contain
serious errors in grammar that impede and distract the reader from
understanding the writing. The two papers may show effort but problems
get in the way of its effectiveness.
The 1 paper
This paper usually does not make
a clear point. It may contain serious errors in standard conventions
of English that make it difficult to read and understand. It is
frequently short and repetition. |
|